SIMULATION OF GAS DEHYDRATION ON AN FPSO USING ASPEN HYSYS


SIMULATION OF GAS DEHYDRATION ON AN FPSO USING ASPEN HYSYS 

ABSTRACT

Natural gas is an important energy source among other sources of fossil fuels. It is usually produced saturated with water vapor under production conditions. The dehydration of natural gas is very essential in the gas processing industry to remove water vapor. Water vapor in natural gas stream, poses threat to process facilities if the dew point temperature is not properly controlled. Dehydration of natural gas is the process removal of the water that is associated with natural gases. The mixtures of water in natural gas can cause the problems for the production operation, transportation, storage and use of the gas. The four major methods of dehydration are absorption, adsorption, gas permeation and refrigeration. The process of dehydration by using TEG is absorption, involves the use of a liquid desiccant to remove water content from the gas.

The objective of this experiment is to carry out a simulation on TEG dehydration unit using AspenHYSYS process software. This is important in an FPSO since the removal of water from natural gas is necessary before processing, and due to the fact that Natural gas from the reservoir contains large amount of water which can cause several problems to downstream processes and equipment. TEG was used because it has gained nearly universal acceptance as the most cost effective of the glycols due to its superior dew point depression, operating cost and operational reliability. The composition of the natural gas has been provided on a water-free basis, therefore to ensure water saturation it was mixed with water before entering the first unit operation. The units involved in this simulation are; Contractor, Regenerator, Valve, Component splitter, Cooler, Stripper and Splitter, alongside with an adjust logical tool which was used to find the point at which water is just formed (dew point with a temperature of -13.67Oc). At the end of the converged simulation, 89.92 wt% methane was recovered at a flow rate of 9177kg/hr. which might have resulted due to loss of some of the gases at a certain stage of the process.

                Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION    3

DEDICATION    4

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT    5

NOMENCLATURE    6

ABSTRACT    7     CHAPTER ONE    10

INTRODUCTION    10

1.1     BACKGROUND OF STUDY    10

1.2     DEHYDRATION OF NATURAL GAS    12

1.3     STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM    14

1.4      OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY    15

1.5     RESEARCH QUESTIONS    15

The research question of this project is based on the following;    15

1.6     JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY    15

1.7     SCOPE/LIMITATION OF STUDY    16

1.8     RESEARCH METHODOLOGY    16     CHAPTER TWO    17

LITERATURE REVIEW    17

2.2     NATURAL GAS    18

2.3     PROCESSES IN OFFSHORE PRODUCTION    20

2.3.1      SEPARATION    21

2.3.2      GAS TREATMENT    22

2.3.3     INORGANIC CONTENTS    23

2.3.4     OTHER CONTAMINANTS    24

2.3.5     COMPRESSION    24

2.3.6     LIQUEFACTION OF THE GAS    24

2.4     WATER TREATMENT    24

2.5    WATER IN GAS    25

2.5.1      GAS HYDRATES    26

2.5.2     PREVENTION    26

2.5.3     INHIBITORS    27

2.6    PROCESSING OF NATURAL GAS    28

2.6.1    DEHYDRATION OF NATURAL GAS    28

2.6.2     TYPES OF DEHYDRATION OF NATURAL GAS    31

2.6.3    COMPARISON OF THE METHODS    34

2.6.4      GLYCOLS USED FOR DEHYDRATION    34

2.7        DRY GAS    36

2.8     THE GLYCOL GAS DEHYDRATION PROCESS    38

2.8.1      PROCESS DESCRIPTION (EQUIPMENT)    39

2.8.2     TEG DEHYDRATION UNIT    44

2.8.3     DEHYDRATION BY USING TRIMETHYLENE GLYCOL (TEG)    44     CHAPTER THREE    47

METHODOLOGY    47

3.1 Materials used for the simulation    47

3.2 Component selected for the simulation in Aspen Hysys    47

3.3 Fluid package used (Thermodynamics property used)    48

3.4 types of equipment used    48

3.5 Simulation procedure    48     CHAPTER FOUR    50

RESULT AND DISCUSSION    50     CHAPTER FIVE    54

CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATION    54

5.1    CONCLUSION:    54

5.2    RECOMMENDATION    54

REFERENCES    55

CHAPTER ONE:

INTRODUCTION:

1.1     BACKGROUND OF STUDY -

 Natural gas processing is a complex industrial process designed to clean raw natural gas by separating impurities and various non-methane hydrocarbons and fluids to process what is known as pipeline quality dry natural gas (^ Fact sheet: Natural gas processing). Natural gas processing begins at the well head. The composition of the raw natural gas extracted from producing wells depends on the type, depth and location of the underground deposit and the geology of the area. Oil and natural gas are often found together in the same reservoir. The natural gas produced from oil wells is generally classified as associated- dissolved, meaning that the natural gas is associated with or dissolved in crude oil. Natural gas production absent any association with crude oil is classified as “non-associated”.

Natural gas processing plants purify raw natural gas by removing common contaminants such as water, carbon dioxide (CO2 ) and hydrogen sulfide (H2s). Some of the substances which contaminate natural gas have economic value and are further processed or sold. A fully operational plant delivers pipeline-quality dry natural gas that can be used as fuel by residential, commercial and industrial consumers. The raw natural gas must be purified to meet the quality standard specified by the major pipeline transmission and distribution companies. These quality standards vary from pipeline to pipeline and are usually a function of a pipeline system design and the markets that it serves. In general, the standards specify that the natural gas:

⦁    Be within a specific range of heating value(caloric value) for example, in the united states, it should be about 1035±5% BTU per cubic feet of the gas at 1 atmosphere and 600 (41 MJ ±5% per cubic meter of gas at 1 atmosphere and 15.60 c).

⦁    Be delivered at or above a specified hydrocarbon dew point temperature (below which some of the hydrocarbons in the gas might condense at pipeline pressure forming liquid slugs that could damage the pipeline).

⦁    Dew-point adjustment serves the reduction of the concentration of water and heavy hydrocarbons in natural gas to such an extent that no condensation occurs during ensuing transport in the pipelines.

⦁    Be free of particulate solids and liquids water to prevent erosion, corrosion or other damages to the pipeline.

⦁    Be dehydrated of water vapor sufficiently to prevent the formation of methane hydrate within the gas processing plant or subsequently within the sales gas transmission pipeline. A typical water content specification in the U.S. is that gas must contain no more seven pounds of water per million standard cubic feet (MMSCF) of gas. (Prof. Jon Steiner Gudmundsson)

⦁    Contain no more than trace amounts of components such as hydrogen sulfide, carbon dioxide, mercaptans and nitrogen. The most common specification for hydrogen sulfide content is 0.25 grain H2S per 100 cubic feet of gas, or approximately 4 ppm. Specification for C02 typically limit the content to no more than two or three percent.

⦁    Maintain mercury at less than detectable limits (approximately 0.001 ppb by volume) primarily to avoid damaging equipment in the gas processing plant or the pipeline transmission system from mercury amalgamation and embrittlement of aluminum and other metals.

The natural gas product fed into the mainline gas transportation system must    meet specific quality measures in order for the pipeline grid to operate properly. Natural gas produced at the wellhead, which in most cases contains contaminants and natural gas liquids, must be processed and cleaned, before it can be safely delivered to the high-pressure, long-distance pipelines that transport the product to the consumers. Natural gas that is not within certain specific gravities, pressures, Btu content range, or water content levels will cause operational problems, pipeline deterioration, or can even cause pipeline rupture. Gas processing equipment, whether in the field or at processing/treatment plants, assures that these tariff requirements can be met. While in most cases processing facilities extract contaminants and heavy hydrocarbons from the gas stream, in some cases they instead blend some heavy hydrocarbons into the gas stream in order to

bring it within acceptable Btu levels. Natural gas processing begins at the wellhead. The composition of the raw natural gas extracted from producing wells depends on the type, depth, and location of the underground deposit and the geology of the area. Oil and natural gas are often found together in the same reservoir. Natural gas production absent any association with crude oil is classified as “Non-associated”. Most natural gas production contains, to varying degrees, small (two to eight carbons) hydrocarbon molecules in addition to methane. Although they exist in a gaseous state at underground pressures, these molecules will become liquid (condense) at normal atmospheric pressure. Collectively, they are called condensates or natural gas liquids (NGLs).

1.2     DEHYDRATION OF NATURAL GAS

Natural gas usually contains significant quantities of water vapor. Changes in temperature and pressure condense this vapor altering the physical state from gas to liquid to solid.A dehydration process is needed to eliminate water which may cause the formation of hydrates. Hydrates form when a gas or liquid containing free water experiences specific temperature/pressure conditions. Dehydration is the removal of this water from the produced natural gas and is accomplished by several methods. Among these is the use of ethylene glycol (glycol injection) systems as an absorption mechanism to remove water and other solids from the gas stream. Alternatively, adsorption dehydration may be used, utilizing dry-bed dehydrators towers, which contain desiccants such as silica gel and activated alumina, to perform the extraction.

                             In 1810, an English scientist by the name John Dalton stated the total pressure of a gaseous mixture is equal to the sum of the partial pressure of the components. This statement, now known as Dalton’s law of partial pressure, allows us to compute the maximum volume of water vapor that natural gas can hold for a given temperature and pressure. The wet inlet gas temperature and supply pressure are the most important factors in the accurate design of a gas dehydration system. Without this basic information the sizing of an adequate dehydrator is impossible. There are many other important pieces of design information required to accurately size a dehydration system. These include pressures flow rate and volumes.

All gases have the capacity to hold water in a vapor state. This water vapor must be removed from the gas stream in order to prevent the formation of solid ice like crystals called hydrates. Hydrates can block pipelines, valves and other process equipment. The dehydration of natural gas must begin at the source of the gas in order to protect the transmission system.

                 The source of the gas moved through the transmission lines may be producing wells or developed storage pools. Pipelines drips installed near well heads and at strategic locations along gathering and trunk lines will eliminate most of the free water lifted from the wells in the gas stream. Multi stage separators can also be deployed to insure the reduction of free water that may be present. Water vapor moved through the system must be reduced to acceptable industry level. Typically, the allowable water content in gas transmission lines ranges from 41b. to 7lb. per MMSCF.

Dehydration systems used in the natural gas industry fall into four categories in principle:

⦁    Direct cooling

⦁    Indirect cooling (Expander or Joule-Thomson valve)

⦁    Adsorption

⦁    Absorption

 Direct cooling: The ability of natural gas to contain water vapor decreases as the temperature is lowered at constant pressure. During the cooling process, the excess water in the vapor state becomes liquid and is removed from the system. Natural gas containing less water vapor at low temperature is output from the cooling unit. The gas dehydrated by cooling is still at its water dew point unless the temperature is raised again or the pressure is decreased. It is often a good practice that cooling is used in conjunction with other dehydration processes. Glycol may be injected into the gas stream ahead of the heat exchanger for instance to reach lower temperatures before expansion into a low temperature separator.

 Indirect cooling: Expansion is a second way of natural gas cooling. It can be achieved by the expander or Joule-Thomson valve. These processes are characterized by a temperature drop to remove condensed water to yield dehydrated natural gas. The principal is the similar to the removal of humidity from outside air as a result of air conditioning. Gas is forced through a constriction called an expansion valve into space with a lower pressure. As a gas expands, the average distance between molecules grows. Because of intermolecular attractive forces, expansion causes an increase in the potential energy of the gas. If no external work is extracted in the process and no heat is transferred, the total energy of the gas remains the same. The increase in potential energy thus implies a decrease in kinetic energy and therefore in temperature.

 Adsorption: Solid desiccant dehydration, also known as solid bed, utilizes the adsorption principles for removing water vapor. Adsorbents used include silica gel (most commonly used), molecular - 8 - sieve (common in natural gas vehicle dryers), activated alumina and activated carbon. The wet gas enters into an inlet separator to ensure removal of contaminants and free water. The gas stream is then directed into an adsorption tower where the water is adsorbed by the desiccant. When the adsorption tower approaches maximum loading, the gas stream is automatically switched to another tower allowing the first tower to be regenerated. Heating a portion of the mainstream gas flow and passing it through the desiccant bed regenerates the loaded adsorbent bed. The regeneration gas is typically heated in an indirect heater. The undersaturated regeneration gas is then passed through the bed removing water and liquid hydrocarbons. These liquid components have to be removing from gas for two main reasons. First reason is present the water can allow natural gas hydrates forming. Second reason is a lot of corrosive and aggressive compounds (H2S, CO2) can be absorbed in this liquid phase. The regeneration gas exits the top of the tower and is cooled most commonly with an air-cooled heat exchanger. Condensed water and hydrocarbons are separated and the gas is recycled back into the wet gas inlet for processing.

Absorption: The fourth method of dehydration utilizes liquid desiccant and it is the most commonly used for dehydrating natural gas moved through transmission lines. Method removes water from the gas stream by counter current contact, in a tray type contactor tower, with tri-ethylene glycol (TEG). Natural gas enters the unit at the bottom of the adsorber tower and rises through the tower where it contacted with the TEG solution flowing downward across bubble trays. Through the contact, the gas gives up its water vapor to the TEG. The water laden TEG is circulated in a closed system, where the water is boiled from the TEG. The regenerated TEG then is recirculated to the contacting tower.   1.3     STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Natural gas that comes from oil wells is not totally pure but there are contaminants or mixtures in gas or typically termed 'associated gas’ like water vapor, hydrogen sulfide (H2S), carbon dioxide, helium, nitrogen, and other. These mixtures in natural gas can cause the problems for the production operation, transportation, storage and use of the gas. One of those contaminants is water content. This water can result in corrosion of pipeline and fittings in gas transmission systems and the formation of ice or hydrates that causing flow restriction, with resulting consequences in terms of plant operating efficiency.

1.4      OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

This project work would seek to;

1.    Determine gas dehydration process when tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) is used as the dehydrating agent using HYSYS.

2.    Compare tri-ethylene glycol (TEG) with other dehydrating agents

1.5     RESEARCH QUESTIONS

The research question of this project is based on the following;

⦁    How is gas dehydration carried out on an FPSO?

⦁    What is the best method to employ while dehydrating gas?

⦁    How can loss of tri-ethylene glycol be controlled?

1.6     JUSTIFICATION OF THE STUDY

All raw natural gas is fully saturated with water vapor when produced from an underground reservoir. Because most of the water vapor has to be removed from natural gas before it can be commercially marketed, all natural gas is subjected to a dehydration process. This project work discusses the types of glycols that may be used and the process used to re    move water with glycol (TEG).

1.7     SCOPE/LIMITATION OF STUDY

The project work involves the fabrication of the dehydration unit on the Floating, production, storage and offloading vessel (FPSO) and Simulation of the natural gas dehydration using the of Aspen hysys. This work was limited due to financial constraint, difficulty arising from the software used (hysys).

1.8     RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

Aspen hysys software was used as a simulation tool for the dehydration of the gas using triethylene glycol (TEG) as an absorbent for the removal of water vapour.

.

SIMULATION OF GAS DEHYDRATION ON AN FPSO USING ASPEN HYSYS



TYPE IN YOUR TOPIC AND CLICK SEARCH.




TESTIMONIES FROM OUR CLIENTS


Please feel free to carefully review some written and captured responses from our satisfied clients.

  • "Exceptionally outstanding. Highly recommend for all who wish to have effective and excellent project defence. Easily Accessable, Affordable, Effective and effective."

    Debby Henry George, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA.
  • "I saw this website on facebook page and I did not even bother since I was in a hurry to complete my project. But I am totally amazed that when I visited the website and saw the topic I was looking for and I decided to give a try and now I have received it within an hour after ordering the material. Am grateful guys!"

    Hilary Yusuf, United States International University Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • "Researchwap.com is a website I recommend to all student and researchers within and outside the country. The web owners are doing great job and I appreciate them for that. Once again, thank you very much "researchwap.com" and God bless you and your business! ."

    Debby Henry George, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA.
  • "I love what you guys are doing, your material guided me well through my research. Thank you for helping me achieve academic success."

    Sampson, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  • "researchwap.com is God-sent! I got good grades in my seminar and project with the help of your service, thank you soooooo much."

    Cynthia, Akwa Ibom State University .
  • "Great User Experience, Nice flows and Superb functionalities.The app is indeed a great tech innovation for greasing the wheels of final year, research and other pedagogical related project works. A trial would definitely convince you."

    Lamilare Valentine, Kwame Nkrumah University, Kumasi, Ghana.
  • "Sorry, it was in my spam folder all along, I should have looked it up properly first. Please keep up the good work, your team is quite commited. Am grateful...I will certainly refer my friends too."

    Elizabeth, Obafemi Awolowo University
  • "Am happy the defense went well, thanks to your articles. I may not be able to express how grateful I am for all your assistance, but on my honour, I owe you guys a good number of referrals. Thank you once again."

    Ali Olanrewaju, Lagos State University.
  • "My Dear Researchwap, initially I never believed one can actually do honest business transactions with Nigerians online until i stumbled into your website. You have broken a new legacy of record as far as am concerned. Keep up the good work!"

    Willie Ekereobong, University of Port Harcourt.
  • "WOW, SO IT'S TRUE??!! I can't believe I got this quality work for just 3k...I thought it was scam ooo. I wouldn't mind if it goes for over 5k, its worth it. Thank you!"

    Theressa, Igbinedion University.
  • "I did not see my project topic on your website so I decided to call your customer care number, the attention I got was epic! I got help from the beginning to the end of my project in just 3 days, they even taught me how to defend my project and I got a 'B' at the end. Thank you so much researchwap.com, infact, I owe my graduating well today to you guys...."

    Joseph, Abia state Polytechnic.
  • "My friend told me about ResearchWap website, I doubted her until I saw her receive her full project in less than 15 miniutes, I tried mine too and got it same, right now, am telling everyone in my school about researchwap.com, no one has to suffer any more writing their project. Thank you for making life easy for me and my fellow students... Keep up the good work"

    Christiana, Landmark University .
  • "I wish I knew you guys when I wrote my first degree project, it took so much time and effort then. Now, with just a click of a button, I got my complete project in less than 15 minutes. You guys are too amazing!."

    Musa, Federal University of Technology Minna
  • "I was scared at first when I saw your website but I decided to risk my last 3k and surprisingly I got my complete project in my email box instantly. This is so nice!!!."

    Ali Obafemi, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Niger State.
  • To contribute to our success story, send us a feedback or please kindly call 2348037664978.
    Then your comment and contact will be published here also with your consent.

    Thank you for choosing researchwap.com.