ECONOMICS OF SOIL CONSERVATION PRACTICES AMONG SMALL SCALE FARMERS IN ENUGU STATE


ECONOMICS OF SOIL CONSERVATION PRACTICES AMONG SMALL SCALE FARMERS IN ENUGU STATE                                                                               ABSTRACT:          The study investigated the economics of soil conservation practices among small-scale farmers in Enugu State. The study used multi-stage random probability sampling method and the primary data were collected form 120 farmers using structured questionnaire. Data on the socio-economic status of the farmers, forms of land/soil degradation in the study area, methods/ technologies used in combating them, intensity of adoption of selected soil conservation practices, costs and benefits of selected methods of conserving the soil and constraints to adoption of soil conservation practices were obtained. Data obtained were analyzed using percentages, cost-benefit analysis and multiple regression analysis. Based on the 2007/2008 cropping season, it was noted that male (70%) were more involved in soil conservation practices than female (30%). Most of the farmers (61%) had no formal education. Land acquisition was mostly through inheritance (77%). Fifty three percent of the farmers have been in active farming for about 21 – 30 years. Membership of farm organization by farmers was still low (16%). It is noted that 60% of the farmers had never been visited by the extension agents. The major form of soil/land degradation identified in the study area is reduced soil fertility (41%) Majority (43%) of the farmers said that the methods of soil conservation used are indigenous to them. The prevalent soil/land management forms in the study area  are inorganic fertilizer, livestock  manuring, intercropping, cover cropping and leaving crop residue. The study showed the guiding factors to adoption of soil conservation technologies/ methods by respondents as improved yield (return), access to credit, concern for soil erosion and other related soil problems, ownership of land, climatic change, and capital access. The study indicated that out of the thirteen  (13) methods of soil conservation mostly used, 77% of the farmers adopted between 1-6 methods. This showed that the intensity of adoption is relatively low. The farmers that used intercropping, inorganic fertilizer, cover cropping, leaving crop residue an livestock manure combination as method of soil conservation have the highest gross margin of N36750 and benefit-cost of 2.18. The effect/ relationship between farmers’ socio-economic characteristics and intensity of adoption of soil conservation practices showed a coefficient of determination, R2 of 63.2% which was a good fit. The test of influence of the socio-economic characteristics of on farmer’s adoption intensity shows that these characteristics have significant influence on adoption intensity at 5%. There is a significant correlation between the benefits and the cost of soil conservation practices(r-0.936, p<0.05). Access to credit, small farm size, and lack of trainings, poor infrastructure and poor returns were the major constraints to adoption of soil conservation practices by farmers. It was recommended that land should be well defined and property right to land well enforced. Finally, farmers were encouraged to form farm co-operatives fro easy training and access to farm assistance.TABLE OF CONTENTSTitle Page    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    iCertification    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    iiDedication    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    iiiAcknowledgement    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    ivAbstract    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    vTable of Contents    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    viList of Tables    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    viiiCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION1.1    Background Information    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    11.2    Problem Statement    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    21.3    Objectives of the Study    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    41.4    Research Hypothesis    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    41.5    Justification of the Study    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    51.6    Limitations of the study-    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    6CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW2.1    Concept of Soil Conservation    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    72.2    Soil Conservation Methods    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    92.3    Factors Influencing the Economics of Soil Conservation    -    -    -    152.4    Significance of Soil Conservation    -    -    -    -    -    -    222.5    Different Methods that can be Adopted for Economic Analysis of Soil conservation    -    -    -    -    -  242.6    Empirical Studies on Soil Conservation    -    -    -    -    -    292.7    conceptual Issues    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    332.8    Analytical Procedure    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    36CHAPTER THREE: METHOLOGY3.1    Study Area    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    393.2    Sampling Procedure    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    393.3    Sources and Methods of Data Collection-    -    -    -    -    -    403.4    Data Analysis    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    403.5    Model Specification    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    41CHAPTER FOUR: RESULT AND DISCUSSION4.1    Socio-economic Characteristics of the Respondents    -    -    -    -    434.2    Method/ Technologies Used in Combating Soil/ LandDegradation in the Study Area    -    --    -    -    -    -    494.3    Adoption of Selected Soil Conservation Practices by the Respondents    -    534.4    Effects of Scio-economic Characteristics of Farmers on YTheir Intensity of Adoption    of Soil conservation Practices-    -    -    574.5    Benefits and Costs of Soil Conservation Practices    -    -    -    -    604.6    Constraints to Adoption of Soil Conservation Practices-    -    -    -    62 CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSION5.1    Summary    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    635.2    Recommendation    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    655.3    Conclusion    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    66    REFERENCES    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    -    67CHAPTER ONEINTRODUCTION1.1    Background Information    Soil may be defined as a natural body of loose and unconsolidated materials found on the earth’s surface; it is derived from weathered parent rock materials and decaying organic matters and it is composed of solid particles with liquid and or gases occupying the spaces between the particles (Ohaeri, 2000).  It is on this solid that most agricultural as well as non agricultural activities take place.  The food we eat, the raw materials needed by the industries are derived from there, directly or indirectly.  An enduring food security will depend on a sustainable and productive resource base (Amaechina, 2000).    Soil conservation is an investment to enhance the future productive capacity of the soil, it implies reducing risks of soil erosion to a tolerable limit (Lapar and Pandey, 1999).  It is also a set of management strategies for prevention of the soil being eroded from the earth’s surface or becoming chemically altered by over use, salinization, acidification, or other chemical soil contamination (Pagiola, 1993).  It also entails not only control over erosion but all those other measures like correction of soil defects, application of manures and fertilizers, proper rotations, irrigation, drainage, which aim at maintaining the productivity of the soil at a high level (Government of India, 2006).  Soil conservation is also viewed as the use of those practices which will maximize the present value of the long-run returns from land use (Kaine, 1991).    The need for soil conservation arises due to signs of deteriorating agricultural environments which include erosion, flood disaster, desert encroachment and drought, deforestation, loss of land to other uses; if not checked, the soil becomes degraded.  Soil degradation can be defined as a reduction in the land’s actual or potential uses.  If this occurs, productivity is affected, leading to rise in the level of inputs and hence, costs needed to restore soil productivity (Ohaeri, 2000).  Douglas (1992) stressed that degradation can be slowed or arrested by large range of methods including cultural practices like minimum tillage and contour ploughing, vegetative covers and mechanical measures such as terraces and channels.  The principal approaches that soil conservation strategies may take include; vegetative cover, erosion prevention, salinity management, soil pH control, encouraging health of beneficial soil organisms, prevention and remediation of soil contamination and mineralization (Pagiola, 1993).1.2    Problem Statement    Livelihoods of most of the rural households in Nigeria are dependent on land.  The land resource has been employed in varied proportions to meet both subsistence needs and/or cash needs.  Equally, farmers have long recognized that land cannot be used without limit.  They have therefore experienced a decline in land productivity necessitating some actions on their part.  According to Chomba (2004), the traditional redemptive action has been through land-fallow practices, clearing new land areas or crop rotation.  However, with increasing land constraints in most areas, fallow periods have drastically declined.  The traditional farming system that farmers have previously employed to sustain their productivity cannot any longer effectively work due to population pressure.    One of the biophysical constraints to increasing agricultural productivity is the low fertility of soils; and improving soil fertility levels has become an important issue in development agenda because of its linkage to food insecurity and economic well being of the population (Ajayi et al, 2003 and Bekunda et al, 1997).  Also, Hellin (2003) and Sanchez (2003) noted that sustained agricultural production in most sub-Saharan African countries is under threat due to declining soil fertility and loss of biomass.  The smallholder farmers in these countries are quite aware of the declining trends in soil fertility, the reasons for this and its impact on yields and household food security.  Many farmers also do know to some extent how to practice judicious management of their soils, using nutrients available in their vicinity and adopting agricultural practices geared towards soil fertility improvement such as improved fallow, agroforestry and biomass transfer (Johansson, 2001; Wickama and Mowo, 2001).    Soil resource management efforts are crucial to the economic development of the rural dwellers that depend largely on land for livelihood.  However, the success of any soil conservation technique depends not only on the project planners’ perception, but on the farmer’s perception of its economic and environmental costs and benefits (Current et al, 1995).  Despite this fact, there seems to be little empirical evidence on the economics of soil conservation practices especially among smallholder farmers in Enugu State.  To tackle this problem, this study seeks to provide answers to the following questions:⦁    what are the socio-economic attributes of farmers in the study area;⦁    what forms of soil degradation exist, and how do the farmers combat them:⦁    what is the intensity of adoption of soil conservation practices?⦁    what are costs incurred and benefits enjoyed by farmers using soil conservation techniques?⦁    what constraints militate against smallholders adoption of soil conservation practices?1.3    Objectives of the Study    The broad objective of this study is to carry out an economic analysis of the soil conservation practices among small-scale farmers in Enugu State.  The specific objectives are to:i.    describe the socio-economic characteristics of farmers in the study area;ii.    identify the methods/technologies used in combating soil degradation in the study area;iii.    describe the intensity of adoption of selected soil conservation practices by the farmers;iv.    evaluate the relationship between socio-economic characteristics of farmers and the intensity of adoption of selected soil conservation practices;v.    estimate the costs and benefits of selected methods of conserving the soil in the study area;vi.    identify farmers’ constraints in the adoption of soil conservation practices;vii.    make policy recommendations based on the findings.1.4    Research Hypotheses    Based on the specific objectives of this study, the following null hypotheses would be tested.a.    Socio-economic characteristics of the farmers have no significant influence on the intensity of adoption of selected soil conservation practices in the study area.b.    There is no significant difference between the benefits and costs of selected soil conservation practices in the study area.1.5    Justification of the Study    In most of the developing nations of the world, it is becoming increasingly clear that the key to real socio-economic advancement is judicious exploitation of soil resources to increase agricultural productivity.  In many of these countries, population is increasing rapidly and increased crop and animal yields are essential to feed the population and to exchange surplus for manufactured goods and social services (Ohaeri, 2000).  Agricultural produce may provide one of the means of procuring the foreign exchange needed for development (Olaitan et al, 1984).    Concerns about the effects of soil erosion have led to increased promotion of soil conservation technologies in developing countries.  Donor and government funds have been invested in water-shed management and soil conservation project and farmers have been encouraged to invest their own resources in soil conservation technologies.  In order to increase the efficiency with which these resources are allocated to soil conservation activities, the effects of soil erosion need to be assessed.  The costs of erosion and other soil degradation factors can be used to determine the priority for action; and the benefits of potential causes of action can be used to assess their sustainability and efficiency in resource use.    This study would also serve as an exploratory step to identifying the techniques and socio-economic factors affecting soil conservation by small-scale farmers which would then serve as criteria model for agricultural production policy in future.  It would create awareness of the benefits or losses to be encountered in soil conservation methods in the study area.  Vital information would also be made available to agencies involved in setting or making soil conservation practices available in the study area.    This research would also be a guide to other researchers that may want to do further studies relating to soil conservation practices, within the study area and Nigeria in general.1.6    Limitations of the Study    Due to low level of literacy and conservative nature of most of the respondents, it was difficult for them to divulge information, especially ones relating to their income.  Biophysical factors of household farms relating to soil texture and slope of land was not collected.  The data was equally farmer declared, and not observed by an enumerator, hence, it is not possible to establish if the farmers were implementing the practices as per recommendation.  Most of the farmers lacked accuracy in measurement and evaluation; thus, rendering some of the data controversial.  Data was collected on one cropping season only.    Other problems were language barrier (dialect), poor road network, finance and time. 

.

ECONOMICS OF SOIL CONSERVATION PRACTICES AMONG SMALL SCALE FARMERS IN ENUGU STATE



TYPE IN YOUR TOPIC AND CLICK SEARCH.





TESTIMONIES FROM OUR CLIENTS


Please feel free to carefully review some written and captured responses from our satisfied clients.

  • "I love what you guys are doing, your material guided me well through my research. Thank you for helping me achieve academic success."

    Sampson, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  • "researchwap.com is God-sent! I got good grades in my seminar and project with the help of your service, thank you soooooo much."

    Cynthia, Akwa Ibom State University .
  • "Sorry, it was in my spam folder all along, I should have looked it up properly first. Please keep up the good work, your team is quite commited. Am grateful...I will certainly refer my friends too."

    Elizabeth, Obafemi Awolowo University
  • "Am happy the defense went well, thanks to your articles. I may not be able to express how grateful I am for all your assistance, but on my honour, I owe you guys a good number of referrals. Thank you once again."

    Ali Olanrewaju, Lagos State University.
  • "My Dear Researchwap, initially I never believed one can actually do honest business transactions with Nigerians online until i stumbled into your website. You have broken a new legacy of record as far as am concerned. Keep up the good work!"

    Willie Ekereobong, University of Port Harcourt.
  • "WOW, SO IT'S TRUE??!! I can't believe I got this quality work for just 3k...I thought it was scam ooo. I wouldn't mind if it goes for over 5k, its worth it. Thank you!"

    Theressa, Igbinedion University.
  • "I did not see my project topic on your website so I decided to call your customer care number, the attention I got was epic! I got help from the beginning to the end of my project in just 3 days, they even taught me how to defend my project and I got a 'B' at the end. Thank you so much researchwap.com, infact, I owe my graduating well today to you guys...."

    Joseph, Abia state Polytechnic.
  • "My friend told me about ResearchWap website, I doubted her until I saw her receive her full project in less than 15 miniutes, I tried mine too and got it same, right now, am telling everyone in my school about researchwap.com, no one has to suffer any more writing their project. Thank you for making life easy for me and my fellow students... Keep up the good work"

    Christiana, Landmark University .
  • "I wish I knew you guys when I wrote my first degree project, it took so much time and effort then. Now, with just a click of a button, I got my complete project in less than 15 minutes. You guys are too amazing!."

    Musa, Federal University of Technology Minna
  • "I was scared at first when I saw your website but I decided to risk my last 3k and surprisingly I got my complete project in my email box instantly. This is so nice!!!."

    Ali Obafemi, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Niger State.
  • To contribute to our success story, send us a feedback or please kindly call 2348037664978.
    Then your comment and contact will be published here also with your consent.

    Thank you for choosing researchwap.com.