RURAL-URBAN INTERDEPENDENCE ON FUELWOOD IN ANAMBRA STATE, NIGERIA
ABSTRACT: This study examined the rural-urban interdependence on fuel wood in Anambra State, Nigeria using cross-sectional data. The study used purposive and random sampling techniques for the selection of 120 gatherers that constituted respondents for the study. The study employed descriptive and relevant inferential statistics for data analysis. The findings of the study revealed that out of the 14 indicators of the importance of forest examined in the study, the respondents were aware of 11 as importance of forest to people in the study area. The linear regression analysis with an R2 of 0.702 showed that about 70% of the total variations in the income from fuel wood were caused by the specified independent variables in the model. On rural-urban interdependence on forest, (79%) of money and income related benefits flow from urban to rural areas; (88%) of benefits relating to innovative ideas on forestry management and conservation flow from urban to rural areas, about (68%) of forest related market information spread from urban areas to the people in rural areas while about (55%) of awareness of the importance of forest and its related products flow from the urban to rural. About (78%) of benefits in the form of forest related job opportunities spread from rural to urban areas. Using a factor loading of 0.30, the factors that constrain rural-urban flow of fuel wood in the area were: socio-financial; infrastructural/institutional; and distributive factors. The result of the probit model with an R2 of 0.892 indicated that about (89%) of the total variations in the decision of the respondents to either invest in forest development or not were caused by the specified independent variables in the model. Based on the above findings, it was recommended that government should ensure the provision of good feeder and major road network between rural and urban areas in the state, that for smooth flow of fuel wood, marketing channels should be encouraged in order to hasten distribution of the fuel wood among others.
TABLE OF CONTENTSTitle Page -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- iCertification -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- iiDedication -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- iiiAcknowledgement -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ivTable of Contents -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vList of Tables -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- viiList of Figures -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- viiiAbstract -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ixCHAPTER ONE: INTRODUCTION -- -- -- -- -- -- 1Background Information -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1Problem Statement -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 5Objective of the Study -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 6Research Hypotheses -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 7 Justification of the Study -- -- -- -- 7 CHAPTER TWO: LITERATURE REVIEW -- -- -- -- -- 9Definitions of Rural areas and Urban Areas -- -- -- -- -- 9Peri-urban Interface-- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 13Rural –urban differences and Linkages -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16Rural-urban Social Interdependence -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 17Rural-urban Environmental Interdependence -- -- -- -- -- 19Rural-urban Economic Interdependence -- -- -- -- -- -- 21Constrains of Rural-Urban Interdependence -- -- -- -- -- 25Components of Rural-Urban Interdependence -- -- -- -- -- 27Theoretical Framework -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 33Analytical Framework -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 34CHAPTER THREE: RESEARCH METHODOLOGY -- -- -- 39The Study Area -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 39Sampling Procedure -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 39Method of Data Collection -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41Method of Data Analysis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41Model Specification -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41 Multiple Regression Model -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 41Exploratory Factor Analysis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 42Probit Model -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 43CHAPTER FOUR: RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONS -- -- -- 45Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents -- -- -- -- 45Age of the Respondents -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 45 Gender -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 46Educational Qualification. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 46Household Size. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 47Experience -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 48Awareness of Importance of Forest Perceived by Respondents -- -- -- 49Socio-Economic Factors Influencing Income from Fuel wood -- -- -- 52Test of Hypothesis 1. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 55Rural-Urban Interdependence in Terms of Flow of Forest Products -- -- 55 Flow of Forest Related Benefits Between Rural and Urban Areas -- -- 57Factor Constraints to Rural-Urban Flow of Fuel wood -- -- -- -- 60Socio-Economic Characteristics of the Respondents Influencing the Decisions to Invest in Forest Development -- -- -- -- -- 65CHAPTER FIVE: SUMMARY, CONCLUSION & RECOMMENDATIONS -- 68Summary -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 68 Conclusion -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 71 Recommendations -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 72REFERENCES -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 74 Appendix A: Questionnaire -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 82
CHAPTER ONEINTRODUCTION1.1 Background Information Majority of Nigeria’s poor live in the rural areas and depend directly or indirectly on agriculture and its related activities while owning or controlling few physical productive assets (Amaechina and Eboh, 2006). In other words, the above statement shows that Agriculture (farming, forestry, fishing etc), in Nigeria, is practiced mostly by the poor in the rural areas. Consequently, it is from the rural areas that the products of forest such as fuel wood are shifted to the urban areas, where they are highly demanded. In return, the urban areas, offer some developmental services to the rural areas, and this cooperation creates multipronged linkages between the two areas. For instance, Garrett (2005), stated that rural and urban areas share many degrees of interactions; rural areas provide critical consumption goods for urban consumers, such as food, energy, low-cost land and labour, and unique experiences. Urban areas constitute the end market for rural production; provide professional services; offer diverse job opportunities; and generate resources for public and private investment in rural areas. It is now widely recognized that there exists various forms of complementarities between the urban and the rural areas in every country. The various ways these two areas complement each other’s activities have created several linkages between them and these linkages have now been known as the rural-urban interdependence (Okpala, 2003). The rural-urban interdependence especially on fuel wood portrays the linkages that exist between the two areas by critically considering the importance of fuel wood and the roles they play in supporting lives as well as regional development. Fuel wood, otherwise called firewood is simply wood cut for fuel. It is renewable energy source usually obtained from forest (FAO, 2010). According to World Energy Council (1999) fuel wood is primarily for cooking which accounts for about 60 percent of endorsed energy consumption of households in developing countries. For instance, in low income countries, the consumption of fuel wood energy by households is typically ten times the total consumption of commercial energies for other purposes (Denis, 1987). Arnold (1998), noted that fuel wood is gotten from the forest. Forest includes all resources that can produce forest products. Products like timber, fuel wood, charcoal, food, fruits, nuts, pharmaceutics, etc; and forest products services like watershed, erosion control and prevention, soil stabilization etc. Forest, which include all resources that can produce forest products, namely, woodland, scrubland, bush fallow, farm-bush, and trees on farms, as well as ecosystem dominated by trees, provide household with income, ensure food security, reduce the vulnerability of shocks and adversities and increase their well being (Arnold, 1998).Heltberg and Bacon (2003) noted that fetching fuel wood from forest for sales provide considerable amount of employment to people to meet both economic and energy needs of households in rural and urban areas. It allows quick returns on investments and is often practiced in conjunction with agricultural activities. Fuel wood represents a major item in the energy budget of the people of developing countries especially the rural communities (Akujor, 1988). For instance, about 40 percent of the rural population of Anambra state is involved in profitable gathering of fuel wood for sustainable livelihood in the state. (Anambra State Government, 2007). The environmental and economic importance of fuel wood for household energy source initiate rural-urban cooperation, which create various complementary activities that support regional development. The various complementarities existing between rural and urban areas give rise to the development of rural–urban linkage, and the new perspective referred to as the rural–urban linkage development approach, is increasingly becoming the accepted approach (Okpala, 2003). Rural-urban linkage generally refers to the growing flow of public and private capital, people (migration and commuting) and goods (trade) between urban and rural areas. It is important to add to these the flow of ideas, information and diffusion of innovation on the management of the forest for sustainable provision of the resources and durable services for the benefit of both the rural and urban areas. The issues included in the summary of UN-HABITAT (2003) resolutions, show that the old orthodoxy of a discrete and dichotomous approach to urban development as distinct from rural development no longer accords with reality, considering the complementary functions and flows of people, capital, goods and services, employment, information and technology between the two areas. This means that the consideration of rural development as completely distinct from urban development is no longer valid because it is now widely recognized that there exists an economic, social, and environmental interdependence between two areas. There is, therefore, the need for a balanced and mutually supportive approach to the development of the two areas. Also, there is a need to promote rural-urban linkage development approach, which posits urban and rural areas as the two ends of the human settlements continuum (Okpala, 2003). Thus, current discussion on the rural dimension of sustainable urban development should emphasize policies that are supportive of urbanization while addressing the challenge of increasing investment in the physical, economic and social infrastructure that are necessary to improve rural productivity and access to market (Tacoli, 1998).Urban areas are created and further developed by the process of urbanization (Kubisch, 2007). As rapid urbanization of developing countries is inevitable, particularly amidst the phenomenon of globalization, the capital of cities and towns should be strengthened to enable them productively absorb excess rural population and to better manage urban development, while rural development should be based on policies that improve economic and social conditions of rural population and the need for the rural areas to contribute to national economic growth through increased agricultural and non-agricultural productivity (Holland, 1991).1.2 Problem StatementAgriculture in the rural area is faced with a lot of challenges. Poor rural infrastructural problems such as poor transportation network, poor funding, poor policy formulation, poor marketing system etc, hinder the attainment of sustainable agriculture in the rural areas. Atkinson (2004), stated that an improved rural infrastructure is a necessary condition for improving productivity in rural areas and also for enhancing access to agricultural produce by both urban areas and the export market. Poor and inadequate rural infrastructure alongside other challenges negatively affects rural productivity in the country and therefore hampers the flow of forest products such as fuel wood. The inability of fuel wood for cooking energy to meet the inter-regional demand, and also the failure of the people to recognize the environmental importance and economic relevance associated with the flow of fuel wood, could affect regional linkages, and could lead to a decline in opportunities and measures that can improve both the rural and urban livelihoods and environments (FAO, 1997).A wide-ranging literature review, Snoxell (2005), concludes that there is no body of research specially focused on linkages between communities, nor is there a prevailing analytical framework for understanding these linkages, but if well understood and managed, the linkages between rural and urban areas could be the basis for a balanced regional development, which is economically, socially and environmentally sustainable. A good number of studies have been carried out on forest, forestry and forest products, most of them are especially on agroforestry-benefits, economics and environmental degradation (Amaechina and Eboh 2006; Eboh and Achike, 1997, Agada, 2009), none of these studies has really looked into the rural-urban interdependence dimension on fuel wood for. This study therefore, aims to fill these gaps in knowledge. 1.3 Objective of the StudyThe broad objective of the study is to assess rural-urban interdependence on fuel wood in Anambra state.The specific objectives are to: i. describe the level of awareness of the importance of forest in both rural and urban areas of the state; ii. identify the socio-economic factors that influence the output of the fuel wood gatherers in the study area;iii. describe rural-urban interdependence in terms of flow of fuel wood between the two areas;iv. identify the factors that constrain the flow of fuel wood between the rural and urban areas;v. examine the socio-economic factors that influence the decision of the people to invest in forest development;vi. proffer recommendations based on the findings.1.4 Research Hypotheses.Based on the stated objectives of the study, the following null hypotheses were tested:a. Socio-economic factors of the gatherers have no significant influence on the output of forest products.b. Socioeconomic factors do not have significant influence on the decision of the people to invest in forest development.1.5 Justification of the Study: The understanding of rural-urban linkages matters because it provides the basis for measures that can improve both urban and rural livelihoods and environments. Ignoring them means that important opportunities will be lost and in many cases it will also contribute to poor and marginal people’s hardship (Parr, 1990). There are urban initiatives that can better lives in the rural areas, and help support regional development. However, with a narrow urban centric approach, such initiatives are unlikely to be given the priority they desire (Richardson, 1979).Knowledge of the linkages between the rural and urban economies would aid policymakers in addressing interrelated problems, such as declining economic opportunity in rural regions, which is often combined with losses in quality of life in urban areas with high rates of economic growth (Parr, 1990). The findings of this study will be useful by the ministry of agriculture in making related policies to enhance agricultural development and also the flow of its products between the rural and urban areas; the research findings will also be useful to NGOs that are involved in agricultural and regional development. It will guide both the government agencies and NGOs to formulate policies that will help the rural and urban areas to understand how their economic fortunes are interrelated and how certain policy proposals directed to the rural economy have feedback effects on the urban economy. Finally, researchers who are interested in the area of interdependence and linkages between rural and urban areas will be guided to be more focused based on the information that will be provided by the study..