THE EFFECT OF EMPLOYEES PARTICIPATION IN DECISION MAKING ON ORGANISATION PERFORMANCE (NIGERIA BAG MANUFACTURING PLC)

ABSTRACT

This research work tends to examine the effect of employees participation in decision making on organisation performance with special reference to Nigeria Bag Manufacturing Plc. Survey design was employed and simple random  sampling technique was used in selection from the population. Primary means was data collection adopted with the use of a well structured questionnaire.

One hundred questionnaires were administered to staff of Nigeria Bag manufacturing Plc. The data collected were presented on tables in percentile. Two hypotheses was formulated and tested with the used of Chi square analysis. The result of the analysis shows that there is significance correlation between employee’s participation in decision making and organization performance.  And that there is significance relationship that exists between employees working experience and level of participation in decision making.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1     Background of the Study

1.2     Statement of the Problem

1.3     Purpose of the Study

1.4     Research Questions

1.5     Statement of Hypothesis

1.6     Significance of the Study

1.7     Scope of Study

1.8     Definition of Terms

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

2.1     Theoretical Background

2.2     The Nigerian Experience

2.3     Concept of Decision Making

2.4     Effect of Workers Participation in Decision Making

2.5       Employee Participation and Family-Friendly Working

2.6     Policy Implications

2.7     Attitude Change

2.8     Combining Participation Measures

2.9     Summary of Literature

CHAPTER THREE

RESEARCH METHODOLOGY

3.0     Introduction

3.1     Sources of Data

3.2     Re-Instatement of Research Questions

3.3             Re-Instatement of Hypotheses

3.4      Limitation of the Study

3.5     Research Instrument

3.6     Method of Data Analysis

CHAPTER FOUR

DATA PRESENTATION AND ANALYSIS

4.1     Introduction

4.2     Demographic Data of Respondent

4.3:    Analysis of Individual Research Statements

4.4      Testing of Hypotheses

4.5      Summary of Findings

CHAPTER FIVE

SUMMARY, RECOMMENDATION AND CONCLUSION

5.1     Introduction

5.2     Summary

5.3     Conclusion

5.4     Recommendations

CHAPTER ONE

INTRODUCTION

1.1     BACKGROUND OF THE STUDY

Economic changes in recent decades have required employers to seek more efficient and flexible means of production. Deregulation and privatization have also significantly altered the Nigeria’s industrial relations climate, with a decline in trade unions' influence and membership. Mirroring this has been the growth in ‘new' forms of work-related participation by employees, under the banner of human resource management and associated programmes and strategies for partnership and high commitment (Abdel, 2003).

Governments must balance the needs of a competitive economy with the welfare of their citizens. A change in political climate has seen social partnership currently being promoted by all interested parties. Reflecting this change, the inclusion of trade unions in government consultation exercises is significant. (Schuler, 2005)

Employee participation in decision-making has attracted a great deal of interest among management writers, researchers, and more encouragingly, managers in organizations as well. It is generally believed to be instrumental in increasing productivity, as the Japanese has shown, through creating satisfied and motivated employees. Thus in recent years, many participative programmes were introduced in organizations. Among them are quality circles, total quality management, work councils, works teams, and so on (Abdel, 2003).

Employee participation in decision-making has been defined in various ways. Some writers associate it with terms such as influence, involvement, decision-making, and control.  Participation can also include indirect forms such as through employee representatives like trade unions and so forth as against the direct form where employees are involved in the decision-making process directly. However, most writers tend to be concerned with the direct form of participation rather than the indirect form.

Participation here is as the degree to which employees perceive they have involvement and/or influence in the decision-making process in their organizations that might have impacts on their jobs, whether such impacts may be direct or indirect. Such decisions may include goal setting, evaluating alternatives which lead to making the final choice, solving problems, "organizational development" and other similar kinds of decisions in an organization, (Schuler, 2005).

The relationships between employee participation and performance as well as with job satisfaction have been fairly well researched in developed countries.

Generally, these studies have indicated that employee participation is positively related to employee performance and job satisfaction. However, one question that arises concerns the generalization of these findings across cultures.

If employee participation were to benefit organizations, then what factors could be considered by management personnel to be implemented successfully in their organizations? In addressing this issue, most studies in the past have examined the effects of individual characteristics on participation.  However, the effect of organizational variables on employee participation has not been thoroughly researched (Schuler, 2005).

Similarly, the effect of employees' motivation to participate in the decision-making process in their organizations has also not been thoroughly researched.

Against this background, the three main rationales for introducing employee participation are based upon different economic, social and political assumptions:

i.        Economic – changes in employees' attitudes and behaviour are achieved through financial participation, by offering employees a stake in the firm. Employees' association with management values and goals is thereby increased, and they are more motivated and committed to achieving those goals.

ii.       Social – by catering for employees' social needs, through improved job security and satisfaction and quality of working life, higher performance is achieved. Alternatively, satisfying social needs can be treated as an end in itself.

In attempting to explain participation performance and participation-satisfaction relationships the objective of this study will be examined.

1.2     STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

The relationships between employee participation and performance as well as with job satisfaction have been fairly well researched in developed countries.

Generally, these studies have indicated that employee participation is positively related to employee performance and job satisfaction. However, one question that arises concerns the generality of these findings across organizational cultures.

Furthermore, most of these studies were carried out in profit making organizations. Would similar findings also apply to employees in non-profit making settings such as a training organization?

If employee participation were to benefit organizations, then what factors could be considered by management personnel to be implemented successfully in their organizations? In addressing this issue, most studies in the past have examined the effects of individual characteristics on participation.  However, the effect of organizational performance on employee decision participation has not been thoroughly researched (Schuler, 2005).

Similarly, the effect of employees' motivation to participate in the decision-making process in their organizations has also not been thoroughly researched.

1.3     PURPOSE OF THE STUDY

The overall aim of the objective of this study is to examine the nature of relationships between selected independent variables with employee participation in decision-making and how it affects organizations performance.  The study was conducted to determine the effect to which employee participation is related to organization performance and job satisfaction using Bagco Super Sack as a study. The study shall aim at the following: Other objectives include to:

i.        determine  if  higher the level of employee participation in decision-making the higher would be the organization performance, job satisfaction and job performance

ii.       examine whether the more years of working experience (holding current job, serving in current organization, and total working experience) the higher would be the level of participation.

iii.      determine if the higher the job ability or task competency the higher would be the level of employee participation in decision-making.

iv.      Determine Employees who possess progressive and dynamic personality traits show higher levels of need for achievement, need for independence, and need for power; but a lesser degree of authoritarianism tend to have a higher level of participation in decision-making.

v.       Determine if the greater the motivation to participate, the greater would be the level of participation.

vi.     To determine if the more conducive the work environment (greater superior supportiveness, superior's lesser degree of authoritarianism, positive task attributes, work pressure, and pace of change) the higher would be the level of employee participation in decision-making.

1.4     RESEARCH QUESTIONS

i.        The higher the level of employee participation in decision-making the higher would be the organization performance and job satisfaction.

ii.       The more years of working experience (holding current job, serving in current organization, and total working experience) the higher would be the level of participation.

iii.      The higher the job ability or task competency the higher would be the level of employee participation in decision-making.

iv.      Employees who possess progressive and dynamic personality traits show higher levels of need for achievement, need for independence, and need for power; but a lesser degree of authoritarianism tend to have a higher level of participation in decision-making.

v.       The greater the motivation to participate, the greater would be the level of participation and organization.

vi.      The more conducive the work environment (greater superior supportiveness, superior's lesser degree of authoritarianism, positive task attributes, work pressure, and pace of change) the higher would be the level of employee participation in decision-making.

vii.     Are there policies lay down by BAGCO Sack Management for lower and middle staff participation in decision making?

1.5     STATEMENT OF HYPOTHESIS

In order to find some answers to the research questions posed above, a study was conducted among staffs in (BAGCO), and the relevant hypotheses selected for testing included the following:

Hypothesis 1

H0:     That there is no significant correlation between employee’s participation and organization performance.

H1:     That there is significance correlation between employee’s participation in decision making and organization performance.

Hypothesis 2

Ho:    there is no significance relationship that exist between employees working           experience and level of participation in decision making.

Hi:     there is significance relationship that exists between employees working experience and level of participation in decision making.

1.6     SIGNIFICANCE OF THE STUDY

The relevance of this study is aimed at showing the importance of employee participation if properly enhanced, certain critical factors will be present in an organization.

i.        These include supportive superiors who are less authoritarian in their management approach.

ii.       Employees would be independence and perceive that they face a moderate amount of work pressure.

iii.      Individuals with high need for independence, achievement, and job abilities are likely to perform better in their jobs.

iv.      On outcomes from participation, trainers were found to place greater importance on intrinsic than extrinsic outcomes

The study will also be useful to scholars in the field of social science, management and other related field as secondary source.

1.7     SCOPE OF STUDY

The scope of this study will be limited to the personnel of the organization of study (BAGCO). However, only the middle and lower category staff will be given the questionnaire. (Category A: Middle staff), and the lower officers (Category B: Lower Staffs) the research work will focus mainly on the employees participation in decision making. The study shall be conducted at the Lagos office of Bag Manufacturing Company Nigeria Plc, for the sampling of opinions on the subject.

1.8     DEFINITION OF TERMS

Employees: Personnel who are paid to work

Decision: The ability to choose or decide about things in a clear and definite way without too much hesitation or delay.

Participation: To take part in an event or activity.

Decision Making: The process of making choices or reaching conclusions, especially on important political or business matters, deciding on important matters.

Organization performance: a group of people identified by a shared interest or purpose to develop and enhance the growth of their company.

.

Click Here To Get The Complete Project »

How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

  • Methodology In Research Paper


    Chapter three of the research project or the research methodology is another significant part of the research project writing. In developing the chapter three of the research project, you state the purpose of research, research method you wish to adopt, the instruments to be used, where you will collect your data, types of data collection, and how you collected it.

    This chapter explains the different methods to be used in the research project. Here you mention the procedures and strategies you will employ in the study such as research design, study design in research, research area (area of the study), the population of the study, etc. You also tell the reader your research design methods, why you chose a particular method, method of analysis, how you planned to analyze your data.

    Your methodology should be written in a simple language such that other researchers can follow the method and arrive at the same conclusion or findings.

    You can choose a survey design when you want to survey a particular location or behavior by administering instruments such as structured questionnaires, interviews, or experimental; if you intend manipulating some variables.

    The purpose of chapter three (research methodology) is to give an experienced investigator enough information to replicate the study. Some supervisors do not understand this and require students to write what is in effect, a textbook.

    A research design is used to structure the research and to show how all of the major parts of the research project, including the sample, measures, and methods of assignment, work together to address the central research questions in the study. The chapter three should begin with a paragraph reiterating the purpose of research. It is very important that before choosing design methods try and ask yourself the following questions: Will I generate enough information that will help me to solve the research problem by adopting this method?

    Method vs Methodology

    I think the most appropriate in methods versus methodology is to think in terms of their inter-connectedness and relationship between both. You should not beging thinking so much about research methods without thinking of developing a research methodology.

    Metodologia or methodology is the consideration of your research objectives and the most effective method and approach to meet those objectives. That is to say that methodology in research paper is the first step in planning a research project work.

    Design Methodology: Methodological Approach

    Example of methodology in research paper, you are attempting to identify the influence of personality on a road accident, you may wish to look at different personality types, you may also look at accident records from the FRSC, you may also wish to look at the personality of drivers that are accident victims, once you adopt this method, you are already doing a survey, and that becomes your metodologia or methodology.

    Your methodology should aim to provide you with the information to allow you to come to some conclusions about the personalities that are susceptible to a road accident or those personality types that are likely to have a road accident.

    The following subjects may or may not be in the order required by a particular institution of higher education, but all of the subjects constitute a defensible in metodologia or methodology chapter.

    Click here to complete this article - How To Write Chapter Three Of Your Research Project (Research Methodology)

TESTIMONIES FROM OUR CLIENTS


Please feel free to carefully review some written and captured responses from our satisfied clients.

  • "I love what you guys are doing, your material guided me well through my research. Thank you for helping me achieve academic success."

    Sampson, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  • "researchwap.com is God-sent! I got good grades in my seminar and project with the help of your service, thank you soooooo much."

    Cynthia, Akwa Ibom State University .
  • "Sorry, it was in my spam folder all along, I should have looked it up properly first. Please keep up the good work, your team is quite commited. Am grateful...I will certainly refer my friends too."

    Elizabeth, Obafemi Awolowo University
  • "Am happy the defense went well, thanks to your articles. I may not be able to express how grateful I am for all your assistance, but on my honour, I owe you guys a good number of referrals. Thank you once again."

    Ali Olanrewaju, Lagos State University.
  • "My Dear Researchwap, initially I never believed one can actually do honest business transactions with Nigerians online until i stumbled into your website. You have broken a new legacy of record as far as am concerned. Keep up the good work!"

    Willie Ekereobong, University of Port Harcourt.
  • "WOW, SO IT'S TRUE??!! I can't believe I got this quality work for just 3k...I thought it was scam ooo. I wouldn't mind if it goes for over 5k, its worth it. Thank you!"

    Theressa, Igbinedion University.
  • "I did not see my project topic on your website so I decided to call your customer care number, the attention I got was epic! I got help from the beginning to the end of my project in just 3 days, they even taught me how to defend my project and I got a 'B' at the end. Thank you so much researchwap.com, infact, I owe my graduating well today to you guys...."

    Joseph, Abia state Polytechnic.
  • "My friend told me about ResearchWap website, I doubted her until I saw her receive her full project in less than 15 miniutes, I tried mine too and got it same, right now, am telling everyone in my school about researchwap.com, no one has to suffer any more writing their project. Thank you for making life easy for me and my fellow students... Keep up the good work"

    Christiana, Landmark University .
  • "I wish I knew you guys when I wrote my first degree project, it took so much time and effort then. Now, with just a click of a button, I got my complete project in less than 15 minutes. You guys are too amazing!."

    Musa, Federal University of Technology Minna
  • "I was scared at first when I saw your website but I decided to risk my last 3k and surprisingly I got my complete project in my email box instantly. This is so nice!!!."

    Ali Obafemi, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Niger State.
  • To contribute to our success story, send us a feedback or please kindly call 2348037664978.
    Then your comment and contact will be published here also with your consent.

    Thank you for choosing researchwap.com.