GAS LIFT OPTIMIZATION OF OIL PRODUCING WELLS USING PROSPER NODAL ANALYSIS


GAS LIFT OPTIMIZATION OF OIL-PRODUCING WELLS USING PROSPER NODAL ANALYSIS 

ABSTRACT

In this study, the method of nodal analysis was employed to design the optimum well completion needed by a particular oil well (designated as C-05) located off the coast of the Niger Delta. Based on available data from the geometry and configuration of the well, as well as well test data, an analytical software, PROSPER, used for well design, modelling and performance calculations, was first used to calibrate the well i.e. model its behaviour. The well has an issue of increasing water cut which has a huge impact on oil production negatively. Using the calibrated model, sensitivity runs were carried out on suspected node that could help cub the problem, i.e. provide higher water cut that would still keep production rate within its economic limit and extend the well’s life. The software approach was based on the principles of Nodal analysis. This work shows the use of nodal analysis in predicting well performance and optimising a system.

TABLE OF CONTENT

Title Page………………..i

Certification………….…ii

Dedication………………iii

Acknowledgement……….iv

Table of content……...…v

Abstract.......................vi

CHAPTER ONE

1.0     Introduction

1.1 ARTIFICIAL LIFT

1.1.1TYPES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT

1.2 GAS LIFT

GAS LIFT TYPES

CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT

INTERMITTENT FLOW GAS LIFT

1.1 Background of the study.

1.2 statement of the problem

1.3 Objectives of the study

1.4 scope of the study

1.5 Limitations of the study

CHAPTER TWO

LITERATURE REVIEW

Literature review

2.0    production system

2.1 Production optimization

2.2 Nodal analysis

2.3 Concept of the Nodal analysis approach

2.4    AUTHOR’S CONTRIBUTIONS

CHAPTER 3

METHODOLOGY

3.1.    INTRODUCTION TO THE METHODOLOGY

3.2    DATA SOURCE AND DATA ANALYSIS

3.3    STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

3.4    CASE STUDY OBJECTIVES

3.5    PROSPER

3.6    OBJECTIVE 1:    Simulate well X-05 performance by building a representative

(valid) model using PROSPER.

3.7    OBJECTIVE 2:    Simulating Base Case forecast under various operating

conditions.

3.8    OBJECTIVE 3:    Evaluating various development options to optimize oil

Production

CHAPTER 4

SYSTEM DATA, RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

4.1    OPTIONS

4.2    PVT DATA

4.3    IPR DATA

RESULTS

4.4    EQUIPMENT DATA

4.5    ANALYSIS SUMMARY

and many more.

4.5.1    SIMULATING BASE CASE FORECAST UNDER VARIOUS OPERATING

CONDITIONS.

4.5.2    EVALUATING VARIOUS DEVELOPMENT OPTIONS TO OPTIMIZE OIL

PRODUCTION

CHAPTER 5

CONCLUSION

5.1   RECOMMENDATION-

REFERENCES

CHAPTER ONE

1.0     Introduction

Hydrocarbons(oil and gas) are found in the pore spaces of sedimentary geologic formations (reservoir rocks).  Once an oil or gas reservoir is discovered and assessed, production engineers begin the task of maximizing the amount of oil or gas that can ultimately be recovered from it. Some reservoir rocks may allow the oil and gas to move freely, making it easier to recover. Other reservoirs do not part with the oil and gas easily and require special technique to move the oil or gas from the pore spaces in the reservoir rock to a producing well. Even with today’s technology, in some reservoirs more than two-thirds of the oil in the reservoir may not be recoverable.

Optimum production of oil from an oil reservoir is the main objective or target of the operators of an oil well in order to meet up with the growing demands of the crude oil. The efficient production of fluids from a reservoir depends on the maintenance of the pressure draw down between the reservoir and the well bore which is the driving force or energy that forces the reservoir fluid (oil) from the reservoir into the wellbore.

 The productivity of the system is dependent on the pressure loss which occurs in

several areas of the flow system namely:-

• The reservoir

• The wellbore

• The tubing string

• The choke

• The flow line

• The separator

Image

Fig 1: The production system.

Under natural flowing conditions the reservoir pressure

must provide all the energy to operate the system i.e. all the pressure drop in the system.

PR= ∆PSYSTEM + PSEP

where;

PR = reservoir pressure

∆PSYSTEM = total system pressure drop

PSEP = separator pressure

To maintain an optimum production rate from the well, the reservoir energy which is the pressure draw down between the wellbore and the reservoir must be maintained or sustained. The sustenance or maintenance of this energy (pressure draw down) depends on the reservoir drive mechanism.

1.1 ARTIFICIAL LIFT

Artificial lift is any process used to raise oil to the surface through a well after reservoir pressure has declined to the point at which the well no longer produces by means of natural energy.

At some time in the life of a well, the reservoir will no longer be able to flow naturally to the surface at the required rate. This may be due to:-

⦁    Insufficient pressure draw down between the reservoir and the well.

⦁    Dead wells which are as a result of pump kill fluid into them.

⦁    Increasing water-cut or production.

The above conditions have something in common; the hydrostatic gradient is higher than the pressure gradient. The reservoir’s natural energy must then be supplemented by some form of artificial lift.

(a)                                                                               (b)

Fig 1.2 (a) IPR/VLP curve for a naturally flowing well, (b) IPR/VLP curves for a dead well.

1.1.1TYPES OF ARTIFICIAL LIFT

There are four basic ways of producing an oil well by artificial lift. These are:

1.    Gas Lift

2.    Sucker Rod Pumping

3.    Submersible Electric Pumping

4.    Subsurface HydraulicPumping

1.2 GAS LIFT

Gas lift is one of the artificial lift method used in the industry to supplement the reservoir energy for continued production of oil. Gas lift is either a continuous or intermittent process whereby gas is injected into the well to reduce the density of the produced fluid. This has the effect of reducing the static head in the tubing thereby assisting the flow of fluid from the reservoir through the tubing to the well head..  The technology (gas lift) has been used to produce oil and gas from wells with low reservoir pressure by reducing the hydrostatic pressure in the tubing. Gas is injected into the tubing as deep as possible and mixes with the fluid from the reservoir. Gas lifting is considered to be one of the most flexible and cost-effective artificial lift systems. The optimum level of production rates versus lifting depth achieved for this system is unmatched (Eikrem et al, 2002). This system is best used for highly deviated wells producing sand, for wells with high formation of gas and liquid ratios, and for wells with multiple completions (Brown et al, 1980). Thus, optimizing production levels for these wells is one of the most important concerns of oil and gas companies. As oil wells mature, engineers face bigger challenges in recovering oil. One of the most common techniques used for improving crude oil production is through gas lifting. Because of its low operating cost and flexibility of production that it provides, many companies are involved with this system as it accounts for some reasonable proportion of oil production as evident from table 1. However, several factors limit the effectiveness of gas lifting, as different reservoirs are faced with variable pressure levels, temperature, and depositions. Therefore, as operations take place, the need for continuous system design, diagnosis, and troubleshooting arises in order to optimize production levels.

GAS LIFT TYPES

There are two basic types of gas lift systems used in the oil industry.

These are;

⦁    Continuous flow gas lift

⦁    Intermittent flow gas lift

CONTINUOUS FLOW GAS LIFT

In the continuous flow gas lift process, relatively high pressure gas is injected downhole into the fluid column. This injected gas joins the formation gas to lift the fluid to the surface by one or more of the following processes:

1.    Reduction of the fluid density and the column weight so that the pressure differential between reservoir and wellbore will be increased

2.    Expansion of the injection gas so that it pushes liquid ahead of it which further reduces the column weight thereby increasing the differential between the reservoir and the wellbore.

3.    Displacement of liquid slugs by large bubbles of gas acting as pistons.

If the lower flowing pressure gradient reduces the flowing bottomhole pressure (BHFP) to establish the drawdown required for attaining a design production rate from the well. If sufficient drawdown in the bottomhole pressure (BHP) is not possible by continuous flow, intermittent gas lift operation may be used.

fig 1-3 continuous gas lift installation.

INTERMITTENT FLOW GAS LIFT

This operates on the principle of intermittent gas injection. Gas lift injection occurs for a certain length of time and then stops. After a period of time has elapsed, injection again takes place and the cycle is repeated. In the intermittent flow system, fluid is allowed to accumulate and build up in the tubing at the bottom of the well.

 The frequency of gas injection in intermittent lift is determined by the amount of time required for a liquid slug to enter the tubing. The length of the gas injection period depends on the time required to push a slug of liquid to the surface.

Gas lift is essentially an extension of natural flow, whereby the producing GOR (gas oil ratio) is artificially increased by the injection of gas. The requirement of gas lift is often a result of either an increased water cut or a declining reservoir pressure.

For maximum benefit, the gas should be injected as deep as possible, reducing the density of the fluid column as much as possible. Gas is injected through gas lift valves, a series of which are run inside pocket mandrels together with the tubing string, and so designed that only one valve is open and passing gas at any one time.

Image

Fig 1-4  Intermittent gas lift installation.

1.1 Background of the study.

Before a well can produce oil or gas, a borehole is drilled from the surface to the oil and gas pool or reservoir rock. The borehole must be stabilized with casings cemented in place. A small diameter tubing string is centered in the wellbore and is sometimes held in place with packers. This tubing will carry the oil and gas from the reservoir to the surface. Reservoirs are typically at elevated pressure because of the underground forces that surrounds them. The driving force which causes these fluids to move out of the reservoir comes from the compression of the fluids that are stored in the reservoir. The actual energy that causes a well to produce oil results from a reduction in pressure between the reservoir and the producing facilities on the surface.  Early in its production life, the underground pressure will often push the hydrocarbons all the way to the surface facilities. Depending on reservoir conditions, this “natural flow” may continue for many years. The production capacity of an oil well is a  key surveillance factor in monitoring the well’s performance  which is dependent on a number of other factors which include; fluid properties and composition of the oil itself, gas oil ratio, water cut, reservoir characteristics and completion strategy/design (Beggs et al, 1991).  The well performance consists of the inflow performance relationship (IPR) which involves flow from the reservoir into the wellbore and the outflow performance which involves flow from the wellbore up the tubing to the surface production facilities. Constant monitoring of the well performance is of paramount importance in the oil and gas industry as it is critical to the crude oil production obtainable from such wells and the equivalent profit margins that will be generated from the production (Hernandez et al, 2001). Monitoring of the well’s performance also help the engineer to determine the economic limit and amount of oil production recoverable from such wells. Once a well is produced down to its economic limit due to pressure depletion, increase in water-cut the pressure differential which is the driving energy becomes insufficient in producing the fluid (oil) to the production facilities

(Beggs et al, 1991).  Gas lift method once applied at the required injection gas rate can supplement the reservoir energy to drive the oil to the surface.

The introduction of lift gas to a non-producing or low producing well is a common method of artificial lift. Naturalgas is injected at high pressure from the casing into the wellbore and mixes with the produced fluids from the reservoir . The continuous aeration process lowers the effective density and therefore the hydrostatic pressure of the fluid column, leading to a lower flowing bottom-hole pressure (Pbh). The increased pressure differential induced  across the sand face from the in situ reservoir pressure (Pr), given by (Pr − Pbh), assists in flowing the produced fluid to the surface. The method is easy to install, economically viable, robust, and effective over a large range of conditions, but does assume a steady supply of lift gas. At a certain point, however, the benefit of increased production due to decreased static head pressure is overcome by the increase in frictional pressure loss from the large gas quantity present. This has the effect of increasing the bottom-hole pressure andlowering fluid production.

1.2 statement of the problem

Movement or transport of oil to the production facilities requires energy to overcome friction losses in the systems and to lift the products to the surface. The production system can be relatively simple or can include many components in which energy or pressure losses occur.

The production rate or deliverability of a well can often be severely restricted by the performance of only one component in the system due to pressure losses. As mentioned earlier, within the life of a reservoir, there is a time when the available reservoir pressure is unable to lift the produced fluid to the surface. This is mainly as a result of pressure depletion , increased water production (water cut). Also, the need may arise for producing companies of oil and gas to maximize the production of oil and gas at the current installation facilities and reservoir condition. Most times, the efforts of the companies are directed to a medium and long term project to maximize the factor of recovery (production of oil to the minor possible cost), and in the short term to accelerate the recovery of the recoverable reservations. These efforts are usually realized during the economic limit period of the well in which the energy for production (pressure draw down) is insufficient for the required production rate. It becomes necessary to optimize the production system of the well to increase the economic recovery and to meet up with the increasing global energy demands.

1.3 Objectives of the study

As discussed earlier, the producing capacities of oil wells reduces as the oil field matures (function of time) due to the combined effects of interrelated factors that affects the well’s performance and economic recovery. To address this issue, optimization of the well (production system ) becomes necessary to maximize the well’s production.

One of the most used techniques for optimizing the oil production systems, considering its verified effectiveness and worldwide level trust worthiness is the Nodal analysis (Beggs et al, 1991). In order to optimize the production system using this technique, it is necessary describing the production system, making emphasis on the components of the production system in order to determine the production capacity of the well. The Nodal analysis allows to evaluate the performance of a completions of production, calculating the relation of the flow of production and the pressure drop that will occur in all its components, allowing to determine the flow of oil or gas that can produce a well bearing in mind the geometry of the perforation and increasing the rate of production to a low cost. Though gas lift optimization will always improve the production capacity, there is a need to identify the gas injection rate and tubing size that will lead to a maximum production from the well.

The project will aim to identify the factors and parameters that affect the well’s performance.

The project will aim to apply the Nodal analysis technique in simulating flow and analyzing the production system of a naturally flowing well and identifying the pressure losses in the producing system.

The project will also aim to design a gas lift system (model) for the naturally flowing well and optimizing the production system to improve the production system via the gas lift system model.

In addition to these, this work will aim to compare the results in terms of production capacity (production rate) for a naturally flowing well and the optimized results of the gas lifted well.

1.4 scope of the study

The study involves the collection of well, reservoir, completion and well test data (and other relevant data) to build a well model in order to characterize the well.

 The following points highlight the scope of this study:

⦁    Designing of a well model that will serve the purpose of this study using relevant input data.

⦁    Appropriate selection of the best correlations available in the Prosper nodal analysis software that will aid in a more accurate performance prediction and matching of the well data.

⦁    Generating the inflow performance relationship (IPR) of the well model to characterize the well’s performance.

⦁    Generating the vertical lift performance (VLP) of the well’s model to characterize the outflow performance of the well.

⦁    Matching the IPR and VLP curve to determine the optimum flow condition of the well at the current reservoir pressure.

⦁    Validating the well model with the help of available well test data.

⦁    Using the validated well model to run a sensitivity analysis and prediction to investigate the effects of different parameters on the well performance.

⦁    Designing a gas lift system for the well model.

⦁    Perform a sensitivity analysis and prediction study as part of the optimization process.

⦁    Comparing the optimized results derived from the gas lifted well model and the natural flowing well.

This will help meet the objectives of this study and also examine the results of optimizing production from the well. The predictions of different parameters that are critical to the performance of the reservoir system will also be analyzed.

1.5 Limitations of the study

During the course of this study, some limitations were highlighted and assumptions made. This was done so as to achieve the goal of this project by idealizing the study/model.

These limitations include:

⦁    Multiphase fluid flow problems along the tubing.

⦁    Ability of the well to deliver a stable flow rate which can impose additional restrictions on the achievable flow rate.

⦁    Well instability.

.


TYPE IN YOUR TOPIC AND CLICK SEARCH.






RESEARCHWAP.COM

Researchwap.com is an online repository for free project topics and research materials, articles and custom writing of research works. We’re an online resource centre that provides a vast database for students to access numerous research project topics and materials. Researchwap.com guides and assist Postgraduate, Undergraduate and Final Year Students with well researched and quality project topics, topic ideas, research guides and project materials. We’re reliable and trustworthy, and we really understand what is called “time factor”, that is why we’ve simplified the process so that students can get their research projects ready on time. Our platform provides more educational services, such as hiring a writer, research analysis, and software for computer science research and we also seriously adhere to a timely delivery.

TESTIMONIES FROM OUR CLIENTS


Please feel free to carefully review some written and captured responses from our satisfied clients.

  • "Exceptionally outstanding. Highly recommend for all who wish to have effective and excellent project defence. Easily Accessable, Affordable, Effective and effective."

    Debby Henry George, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA.
  • "I saw this website on facebook page and I did not even bother since I was in a hurry to complete my project. But I am totally amazed that when I visited the website and saw the topic I was looking for and I decided to give a try and now I have received it within an hour after ordering the material. Am grateful guys!"

    Hilary Yusuf, United States International University Africa, Nairobi, Kenya.
  • "Researchwap.com is a website I recommend to all student and researchers within and outside the country. The web owners are doing great job and I appreciate them for that. Once again, thank you very much "researchwap.com" and God bless you and your business! ."

    Debby Henry George, Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge, USA.
  • "I love what you guys are doing, your material guided me well through my research. Thank you for helping me achieve academic success."

    Sampson, University of Nigeria, Nsukka.
  • "researchwap.com is God-sent! I got good grades in my seminar and project with the help of your service, thank you soooooo much."

    Cynthia, Akwa Ibom State University .
  • "Great User Experience, Nice flows and Superb functionalities.The app is indeed a great tech innovation for greasing the wheels of final year, research and other pedagogical related project works. A trial would definitely convince you."

    Lamilare Valentine, Kwame Nkrumah University, Kumasi, Ghana.
  • "Sorry, it was in my spam folder all along, I should have looked it up properly first. Please keep up the good work, your team is quite commited. Am grateful...I will certainly refer my friends too."

    Elizabeth, Obafemi Awolowo University
  • "Am happy the defense went well, thanks to your articles. I may not be able to express how grateful I am for all your assistance, but on my honour, I owe you guys a good number of referrals. Thank you once again."

    Ali Olanrewaju, Lagos State University.
  • "My Dear Researchwap, initially I never believed one can actually do honest business transactions with Nigerians online until i stumbled into your website. You have broken a new legacy of record as far as am concerned. Keep up the good work!"

    Willie Ekereobong, University of Port Harcourt.
  • "WOW, SO IT'S TRUE??!! I can't believe I got this quality work for just 3k...I thought it was scam ooo. I wouldn't mind if it goes for over 5k, its worth it. Thank you!"

    Theressa, Igbinedion University.
  • "I did not see my project topic on your website so I decided to call your customer care number, the attention I got was epic! I got help from the beginning to the end of my project in just 3 days, they even taught me how to defend my project and I got a 'B' at the end. Thank you so much researchwap.com, infact, I owe my graduating well today to you guys...."

    Joseph, Abia state Polytechnic.
  • "My friend told me about ResearchWap website, I doubted her until I saw her receive her full project in less than 15 miniutes, I tried mine too and got it same, right now, am telling everyone in my school about researchwap.com, no one has to suffer any more writing their project. Thank you for making life easy for me and my fellow students... Keep up the good work"

    Christiana, Landmark University .
  • "I wish I knew you guys when I wrote my first degree project, it took so much time and effort then. Now, with just a click of a button, I got my complete project in less than 15 minutes. You guys are too amazing!."

    Musa, Federal University of Technology Minna
  • "I was scared at first when I saw your website but I decided to risk my last 3k and surprisingly I got my complete project in my email box instantly. This is so nice!!!."

    Ali Obafemi, Ibrahim Badamasi Babangida University, Niger State.
  • To contribute to our success story, send us a feedback or please kindly call 2348037664978.
    Then your comment and contact will be published here also with your consent.

    Thank you for choosing researchwap.com.